In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food? To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The global rise in health issues caused by excessive consumption of fast food has led to debates about the effectiveness of imposing higher taxes on such food items. While some argue that higher taxes can deter people from eating junk food, I believe that this approach would mainly affect the middle and lower income groups.

The imposition of higher taxes on fast food may indeed discourage people with limited financial resources from purchasing these items. The increased cost could make fast food unaffordable for low-income individuals, prompting them to opt for healthier, home-cooked meals. Although this shift might inconvenience them initially, it would ultimately have positive effects on their health. However, for affluent consumers, the higher taxes are unlikely to be a significant deterrent. Their higher disposable income would allow them to continue consuming fast food despite the increased cost. Consequently, increasing taxes on fast food may only marginally affect its consumption among wealthier segments of the population.

Relying solely on raising taxes may not be the most effective strategy to combat the issue. Most people who consume fast food are already aware of its negative health consequences. For instance, a survey conducted in Singapore, a developed country, showed that people are well-informed about the health problems associated with fast food. However, busy schedules and the convenience of fast food options drive them to make such choices despite their awareness.

A more viable solution could involve making healthy food more accessible and affordable. Part of the allure of fast food is its quick preparation time, making it a convenient option for many individuals. By making healthier alternatives readily available and easier to prepare, people would be more inclined to opt for nutritious options over fast food. Supermarkets and food outlets can play a crucial role by offering a variety of healthier, ready-to-eat alternatives, thus providing consumers with healthier choices that are equally convenient.

In conclusion, while higher taxes on fast food may deter lower income groups from its consumption, they are unlikely to have a significant impact on wealthier consumers. Instead, governments should focus on making healthy alternatives more affordable and accessible to all. By providing convenient and nutritious options, individuals may gradually shift towards healthier food choices, contributing to a reduction in health problems associated with fast food consumption.